Back to all work

The Revenue Cup

A four-week team challenge that gets technical specialists to share commercial ideas — and to use Power BI to back them up.

Client
A fictional testing and certification company with six service teams
Audience
Engineers and specialists who know clients well but rarely pitch ideas
My role
Performance gap analysis, programme and game design, job aid, manager brief, measurement
Tools
HTML, CSS and JavaScript for working prototypes. Claude for first drafts of scenarios — every draft reviewed and rewritten by me.
Revenue Cup live scoreboard

The live scoreboard shows the idea behind every score. Visibility, not points, is what motivates teams.

The problem

Leadership wants new revenue ideas from its specialist teams, and it wants more value from a Power BI licence that hardly anyone uses. The first idea was a Power BI course.

A gap analysis showed four problems, and only one was skill. Specialists already had ideas about their clients, but there was no channel for them, no habit of using data to make a case, and no reason to believe an idea would go anywhere. A course alone would fix the smallest of the four.

“We know things about our clients that nobody else does. I just don't know how to make that visible.”
Marcus Bauer, Senior Hazard Assessment Engineer (persona)

How I approached it

  1. Analyse the gapsSkill, motivation, habit and environment — each with its own designed response.
  2. Change the environmentA visible challenge, peer voting and a real prize: six weeks of incubation.
  3. Prototype earlyScoreboard, timeline and examples built as clickable pages.
  4. Plan the measurementBaseline before week 1, repeated after week 4.

Key design decisions

Anchor every idea to live work

In week 1, teams name a real client engagement before they're asked for any idea. That removes the biggest barrier — “I don't know what to submit” — and keeps ideas concrete enough to evaluate.

Compare week 1 and week 3
Before and after submission comparison

Introduce Power BI in week 3, not week 1

Teams meet the tool only when they already have an idea and a question to answer. A one-page job aid shows the three views they need. Week 2, the most likely dropout point, gets a planned mid-point nudge.

Open the timeline
Four-week challenge timeline

Make managers part of the design

Managers get a short brief with three touchpoints, the exact words to use at each, and answers to the four objections their teams are most likely to raise.

Read the manager brief
Manager brief

Everything I built

Each artefact is a working page — open it and click through it as a learner or facilitator would.

Results and next steps

This is a concept project for a fictional client — fully designed, not yet delivered. These are the measures built into the design, so a real pilot would produce evidence from day one.

How I'll measure it

  • Data confidence: “How confident are you that you could use a data tool to build a commercial argument for an idea?” (1–5)
  • Idea belief: “How much do you believe a good idea from your team could reach leadership and be acted on?” (1–5)
  • Motivation profile: why each person is taking part, asked before week 1
  • Scores taken before week 1 and again after week 4

What success looks like

  • At least one data-backed idea reaches a leadership investment decision
  • Data confidence rises by 1.5 points or more on average
  • Belief that ideas reach leadership goes up — the clearest sign the environment changed

Need a learning designer for your next project?

I work with L&D teams, e-learning agencies and training providers — on site in Ingolstadt and Munich, or remotely. Tell me about your audience and what people should be able to do afterwards.